Welcome

I am pleased to welcome you to my personal blog, which I started in March 2009. I first became interested in blogging about five years ago, using old "blogger.com", which was cumbersome to use and I never mastered. About a year ago I discovered that Google had bought "blogger.com" and had revised it considerably, making it fun to use, so much so that I have devised at least 15 blogs on various subjects and frequently add posts and Gadgets to them.

Saturday, September 12, 2009

Motorola turns to Google Android to rescue its mobile business


Motorola's European boss tells us why he is attempting to rebuild his company's mobile fortunes by using someone else's operating system

Nigel Kendall, Technology Editor



The new Motorola DEXT, the company's first Android phone
The new Motorola DEXT, the company's first Android phone
IMAGE :1 of 2
Motorola has announced it will launch a range of phones running the open-source Android operating system that was developed by the internet search giant Google.
The first phone using the system will be called the DEXT in the UK, and will launch on September 15.
Motorola, a 1980s pioneer of mobile phone technology, has experienced a collapse in demand for its mobile phones, its market share falling to just 6 per cent earlier this year, from a peak of nearly 20 per cent in 2007.
“We have basically reinvented Motorola over the course of the last 15 months,” Ralf Gerbershagen, Motorola’s Vice-President and General Manager for mobile devices in Western Europe, told The Times.
Part of that reinvention has been to ditch Motorola’s proprietary operating system from its phones, replacing it across the line with Google’s Android, the open-source operating system that is steadily gaining market share.
On top of the Android system, Motorola will add its own extra application layer, called Motoblur.
“Motoblur basically leverages what is going on around the world in terms of social networking," Mr Gerbershagen said. "We all have friends all around the world, using a variety of networks and hardware. Motoblur brings them all together into one place, and will back up the contents of your mobile phone to a dedicated web space.
“This online storage will give you access to your mobile messages, texts and record from any computer in the world. And if you lose your phone, you can trace it via the website, or remote-delete its contents.”
“The DEXT is the first of a range of smartphones that we are planning to release through 2010,” Mr Gerbershagen said. “By the end of next year, we will offer a range of smartphones, all of which will run on a common Android platform.”
Motorola’s last hit phone was the RAZR, the hottest mobile phone of 2005, but thereafter the company lost its way, and lost several key personnel to Apple.
Mr Gerbershagen is confident that the switch to Android will help the company win back some of its former fans. “The Motorola brand still holds strong, despite our dip in fortunes,” he said, “and millions of people still own a RAZR.”
“A few years ago,” he continued, “the mobile market was completely dominated by hardware. Now, we believe that customers expect their hardware to be up to speed. It is the software that dictates the quality of the experience. We have taken 15 months to redesign our phones from the ground up. Now we are ready to compete.
“Motorola has always had a great design heritage. Now, with Android and Motoblur, we have the software to match, and we are in a great position to take advantage of the current trend for digital convergence on to one device..”
We will be testing the new Motorola DEXT next week to see if it lives up to expectations.

Friday, September 11, 2009

The Fountain of Youth may be closer than you think


[This article was from the front page of this week's Christian Index.]

E-Mail this article E-Mail
Display this article more printer friendly Printer-friendly



Imagine the United States without high blood pressure or a spiraling death rate from cancer. Now, imagine the same nation with little or no heart disease, diabetes, or hypertension.
Now let’s go one step further. Imagine the greatest evangelical nation in history without obesity, stroke, diverticulitis, malformed dental arches, or tooth decay; no varicose veins, ulcers, or hemorrhoids.
If you can stretch your imagination to those limits, let’s take the game one step further. With the elimination of those chronic illnesses, imagine a nation that no longer struggles with a national health care system on the verge of collapse due to largely preventable chronic diseases tied to poor lifestyle choices.

Scott Brooks
That’s the way our nation was before the current era of highly processed foods and an increased reliance on refined carbohydrates. In other words, in the years before we got lazy about what we ate.
It’s not just the poor Americans who don’t have healthy food options or the funds to eat better. It’s also the middle and upper classes who enjoy their convenience foods and their shake-and-bake lifestyle.
In short, the greatest nation the world has ever known is being hobbled by too much of a good thing – The Good Life.
A short history
As Americans moved from a farm-based society to one based on city living, they moved further from their source of food. The canning and storage of fruits and vegetables moved from the kitchen to the large companies that sprang up to take advantage of the cosmic shift in society.
While families began to get more of their fresh items in cans, they still kept alive the art of “scratch cooking” by using those items as just one of many ingredients in casseroles, pies, etc. But a new prosperity was ushered in at the end of World War II and, for the first time in its history, the nation made a giant leap from apartment dwellers to homeowners.
Those homes came with something called a mortgage that required both parents to work outside the home. The food industry, simply responding to the need of the market, developed highly processed food that replaced “scratch cooking” as a timesaving feature.
Real food was deconstructed and reassembled, shaped, and formed into what largely passed for the item it was trying to mimic. An army of food chemists emerged to meet the gastronomic needs of the time-crunched mother. Food colorings and other chemical additives soon found their way into the products that today fill the shelves of every pantry in America.
Much of the change was unavoidable for a society undergoing a radical shift. The question is, what price are we paying for the convenience of tearing the lid off of a box, adding water and an egg or two, and making a cake for a child’s birthday party?
Suddenly, Americans are finding themselves in a highly-evolved society filled with a host of chronic diseases almost unheard of a century ago. And all of this is occurring while other parts of the world, largely untouched by such prosperity, remain far more healthy.
Search for the Blue Zones

Scott Brooks
While Ponce de Leon traveled to Florida just shy of 500 years ago in search of the Fountain of Youth, longevity expert Don Buettner traveled the world for seven years to find where – and how – people were living up to 100 years of age in remarkable health. His search for the modern-day Fountain was conducted under the auspices of the National Geographic Society, the National Institutes for Health, and a consortium of medical researchers from around the world.
The group discovered five areas – the Nicoya Peninsula of Costa Rica; Okinawa, Japan; the highlands of Sardinia, in Italy; Ikaaria, an isolated Greek island; and, surprisingly, Loma Linda, Calif. Residents of the last three locations produce a high rate of centenarians, suffer a fraction of the diseases that commonly kill people in other parts of the developed world, and enjoy more healthy years of life.
Researchers wanted to know how they maintained such a high quality of life with little or no medication or disability. Did they possess modern technology, take massive amounts of supplements, run on treadmills, have special genes? The answer is none of these. It was not about the need for processed food and the convenience it brought. It was all about lifestyle.
Perhaps one of the most stunning observations is there was no taxpayer revolt about rising healthcare costs that were about to bankrupt the government.
The takeaway from the study is simple: “There is no ‘longevity diet,’” Buettner said on a recent broadcast of “The Splendid Table,” an NPR radio program, “though food does play into about a third of the longevity formula.
“The big idea is to eat a plant-based diet. All of the longest-lived people in the world eat mostly plants and avoid all processed foods.”
The Loma Linda group was especially intriguing to the researchers because the centenarians were living in the midst of one of the most densely populated, heavily traffic-congested cities in the world. That, in itself, defeated the notion that an individual would need to move to a less stressful, idyllic location to reap such benefits.
It didn’t take long for the researchers to determine that the group was not the general population but actually a sub-culture: they were Seventh-day Adventists who are largely vegetarians. Their choice to live their lives based on a biblical diet as first established in the book of Genesis – largely fruits, grains, and nuts – has been protecting them against many of the diseases that were sending their non-Adventist neighbors to an early grave.
Fiber in pancakes
So, when did fiber become a selling point for pancake mix? Since General Mills began expanding its highly successful Fiber One product line. Which of these two products would be the more healthful choice? Aunt Jemima makes no fiber claim and contains 1 percent fiber, but the Fiber One product lists five times as much fiber and brags it contains 20 percent of your daily needs.
To be honest, neither is healthy based on the artificial colorings, flavorings, and chemical additives. Fiber One contains 21 ingredients and Aunt Jemima packs in 25 – just to make a simple pancake. Most “from scratch” recipes top out at only five or six.
And the fiber? The extra fiber in Fiber One comes from inulin, a popular additive that does nothing to lower cholesterol. The white powder, a chicory root extract, has not been shown to have any of the healthful benefits that you are paying the premium price for, says the Center for Science in the Public Interest.
But that isn’t keeping Americans from making the Fiber One line one of the hottest new products in recent years.
· The bottom line: If you want pancakes, make your own from scratch using whole grain flour. If you want fiber, eat your fruits and veggies rather than getting it from a box.
They also shared some common traits with other Blue Zone residents. They had developed a lifestyle that included a strong social network of friends and family, had a strong spiritual belief system, and worked exercise into their daily routine.
Dr. Lamont Murdoch of the Loma Linda University School of Medicine summed it up best when he theorized, “Faulty genetics loads the gun, lifestyle pulls the trigger.”
Lifestyle plays larger role than genetics
That would help explain why Americans, with a mostly sedentary lifestyle, are developing chronic diseases that were largely unheard of a century ago when people exercised regularly and ate real food rather than processed food substitutes.
Clarence Ing, medical director of the Weimar Center of Health and Education in Weimar, Calif., believes that Americans frequently use the excuse of having “bad genes” for their health problems, especially being overweight and for developing chronic diseases. It’s just easier to pass the buck than develop new eating habits.
“Lifestyle makes up a far greater part of the health equation than genetics, I’d say at least 50 percent. We can determine this by looking at formerly healthy populations who became ill when changing their lifestyle – especially as they adapted to the high-fat Western Diet.
“Asians, particularly Japanese, have provided us with the best snapshot of how this occurs. Japanese historically have very little incidence of breast cancer and heart disease but as they move toward the east those rates increase,” he says.
Studies show the rates of those diseases increased slightly when the Japanese moved to Hawaii and then increased considerably when they moved to California and were assimilated into the American culture and diet.
Ing is quick to clarify his comments to avoid any misunderstanding.
“You definitely are at higher risk of developing certain diseases based on what your parents had, but that does not mean it is automatic. That’s why we believe that, being human, we all carry certain genetic abnormalities but lifestyle plays a large role in triggering the onset of diseases from those genes.”
For example, if your mother or sister has breast cancer your risk of developing the disease is doubled from the 1-in-8 norm. To lower that risk and to avoid other chronic diseases, Ing recommends a plant-based diet, preferably a vegan diet meaning no meat, fish, chicken, eggs, and dairy products. The same mathematical risk goes for men wanting to avoid colon cancer.
Chronic diseases largely avoidable
That stance is borne out in studies that show that the majority of chronic diseases are lifestyle related and that individuals who eat five or more servings of fruits and vegetables daily seem to have half the cancer risk of people who eat only two servings.
“There are a lot of people today with breast cancer who do not have any family history of the disease. If we know that other cultures that do not share our lifestyle have far fewer cancer cases than we do, it would lead you to believe that our cancer rates are tied to our lifestyle – a lifestyle that has slowly evolved over the past several decades,” Ing says.
A century ago Americans died at an earlier age from natural causes such as pneumonia or infectious diseases. Now they are living far longer due to better medicine but as they age their quality of life decreases due to chronic illnesses.
The odds are not good for those who ignore the health warnings about being overweight or obese.
· One out of every four Americans will die of cancer, much of which is increasingly being tied to consumption of red meat.
· One out of every two will die from some form of cardiovascular disease such as high blood pressure, stroke, or heart attack, much of which is lifestyle related – primarily from being overweight or obese.
The Seventh-day Adventists in Loma Linda have proved that does not have to be the case. The bottom line is that living off the fat of the land – or the fat of the grocery store – is not good for you.
Processed vs. all natural
Processed food manufacturers go out of their way to convince you that their artificial product is actually better for you than the way Mother Nature made it. Take, for instance, how they have transformed the simple bowl of oatmeal.
“All the nutrition of a bowl of instant oatmeal!” touts the health claim on the box of Quaker Oats “Oatmeal to Go.” There’s even an American Heart Association-look-alike logo to suggest it is heart healthy. In fact, it’s the same heart it uses truthfully on its box of Quaker Oats that says “Oatmeal helps reduce cholesterol.” But buyer, beware; do not confuse the truthful health claim of the oatmeal with the processed product.
“Oatmeal to Go” may claim that it has all those nutrients but a look at the label shows that it also has things that you don’t need – like the 43 carbs (versus the 27 in one serving of regular oatmeal) and a whopping 19 grams of sugar (verses the five or six if you use fresh fruit).
And what about the 5 grams of fiber in the processed item verses only 4 in the natural oats? It’s from polydextrose, a man-man fiber with none of the healthful benefits of that found in the natural oats.
The chemical chefs at Quaker Oats had to compile 55 ingredients to make their product. Most bowls of oats only contain three or four: oats, nuts, fruit, and milk/soy milk.
· The bottom line: Nutritionists are increasingly advising consumers against purchasing processed foods with more than five or six ingredients. In this case your cholesterol and digestive tract would be in far greater shape with the bowl of natural oatmeal. Your wallet – and your waistline – would be much poorer with the processed breakfast square.
Seventh-day Adventists are the only known religious group in the nation to have created a documented longevity culture, Beuttner states in his book about the Blue Zones. Their healthful lifestyle first came to the attention of the American Cancer Society about 50 years ago when 25,000 of them were used as a control group in a groundbreaking study of the effects of smoking. Their participation played a large factor in drawing the connection between smoking and lung cancer.
That study revealed the startling result that Adventists, who are overwhelmingly non-smokers, contracted lung cancer at a rate of only 21 percent of the original group. But what really caught the eye of the researchers is that they had a much lower incidence of other cancers, as well as heart disease and diabetes.
That led to a second study funded by the National Institutes of Health that studied 34,000 California Adventists over age 25 from 1974-88, Buettner explains. The result was equally surprising and brought the solid conclusion that Adventists who abide by the denomination’s dietary teachings live longer.
In fact, a 30-year-old Adventist male lives 7.3 years longer than the average 30-year-old white California male. A 30-year-old Adventist female lives 4.4 years longer than the average 30-year-old California white female.
“If you [look at] Adventists who are fully vegetarian, it becomes 9.5 years longer for men and 6.1 years longer for women,” he added.
Another of the key findings was that approximately half of Adventists were vegetarians or rarely ate meat. After additional research it was further discovered that non-vegetarian Adventists – those who ate meat – had about four times the risk of heart disease as vegans or total vegetarians.
Ing sums up the findings about the plant-based lifestyle in two sentences: “The good news is that your genetic disposition is not a death sentence. Your lifestyle choices can make a tremendous difference in the outcome of your health.”
Baptists at ease in Zion
The same support group concept that works for Adventists – surrounding yourself with those of similar dietary and lifestyle values – may be working against Southern Baptists. If there is any truth to the observation that there is comfort in numbers, Baptists are at ease in Zion with their weight.
In spite of the denomination’s churches spending tens of millions of dollars on family life centers equipped with running tracks and exercise machines, it is obvious that most members do not darken the doors of those facilities.
A 2003 study released by Purdue University and published in the Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion asked the question “Does Religion Increase the Prevalence and Incidence of Obesity in Adulthood?” Its findings were less than encouraging: Southern Baptists appeared at the top of the list as the most obese of any evangelical body.
While not presenting a formal explanation of the finding, it did shed insight on how it could occur.
The report acknowledged that many religions in the United States “place priority on constraining sins such as smoking, excessive alcohol consumption, and sexual promiscuity. Gluttony does not receive the same level of pastoral or congregational condemnation in most denominations, perhaps indirectly creating an ‘accepted vice.’
“It is even possible that religion’s success in curtailing smoking may inadvertently lead to a higher rate of obesity. Some people use smoking as an appetite suppressant, and religion decreases the likelihood of smoking.
“Second, many religious functions use food, rather than alcohol, as the celebratory good to be consumed. From Sunday School donuts to church pot-luck dinners, food, especially high-fat foods, are key to the social organization of many U.S. religions.”
Lean – not anorexic – is good
Tony Malizia, prominent Atlanta physician who spoke to retired ministers and spouses at the Georgia Baptist Missions and Ministry Center in March, addressed the dangers of obesity and stressed the need for Baptists of all ages to downsize.
“We know that the leaner you are, the healthier you are. Regardless of the species, from small rats to humans to horses, the less weight you carry, the healthier you will be, and the longer you will live.
“I’m not talking about weight extremes like some anorexics, but the correct amount of weight for your frame. The math is simple; when you are lean your life expectancy increases; when you become overweight or obese, you experience all sorts of chronic health problems that are totally avoidable.”
Malizia and his wife prefer a low-fat diet with lots of fruits and vegetables similar to that used in the Mediterranean. But he doesn’t stop there.
“You have to combine healthy eating with regular exercise. It doesn’t have to be strenuous, but it does need to be regular. For my wife and I that means going on a four-mile walk every morning at 5:30 a.m. That’s how we begin most days.
“We’ve been doing it for 20 years and are healthier for making that a part of our life.”
How to eat healthy for less
If the recent economic downturn hasn’t left you trying to figure out ways to count costs, consider yourself pretty much alone. There are a few, simply ways to trim your food budget, and just possibly trim your waistline in the meantime.
1. Buy local. Choose produce that is in season and locally grown.
2. Focus on the grains and not protein. Rice, pasta, and grains are a good way to round out a meal. Try to choose whole grain foods whenever possible.
3. Invest time, not money. Forgo the convenience foods and focus on preparing dishes yourself and involve your family. While it might seem daunting to give up prepared foods, the premium you pay for someone to prepare foods for you will be invested instead in spending time with your family and cooking healthy alternatives.
Georgia obesity, diabetes seminar set for Nov. 3-5 at Ridgecrest
In 2003 there were 410,000 adult diabetics in Georgia; just four years later cases had nearly doubled to 700,000. The good news is that it is largely preventable by developing a healthy lifestyle.
The California-based Weimar Center of Health and Education will offer a three-day lifestyle intervention seminar in early November at LifeWay Ridgecrest Conference Center near Black Mountain, N.C. The workshop will provide instruction on how to naturally reverse obesity and diabetes with instruction from physicians experienced in preventative medicine.
All classes will be taught by board-certified medical doctors. For information or to register call (800) 525-9192 or visitwww.reversingdiabetes.org.
Front page of the current issue. Click to view larger.

Buy a Tag and Help Women
Choose Life!
(678) 831-0230
www.gachoose-life.org
News Feeds
Subscribe to the print edition
Give a gift subscription










Copyright © 2009, The Christian Index, All rights reserved, Unless otherwise noted.
6405 Sugarloaf Parkway, Duluth, GA 30097
770-936-5590/877-424-6339





Site developed and powered by Sonova Systems



Saturday, September 5, 2009

History of Georgia-Lina Emmaus

[I've just found this article on Emmaus by my good friend and my late wife's pastor that I would like to share. I was a Pilgrim on Men's Walk #9 and worked on at least the next two walks.]


The following writing is a reprint of an article written by Rev. Ron Fearneyhough and originally published in March and April 1995 in "The Fourth Day", the monthly newsletter of the Georgia-Lina Emmaus Community.In the Springtime of 1989, the time of birthing, I first heard about Walk to Emmaus. I too thought it was some sort of marathon. However as Julia Crim, Dr. George Morris' Evangelism Associate at Candler, shared more with me about a "wonderful weekend", my curiosity grew. Her eyes were bright, her countenance shining, her voice filled with enthusiasm, and this young woman a few days before was overwrought with work. Julia had experienced God's love for her and talked about a loving community of faith. Pastoring a church in Blythe, I felt the Emmaus Walk might be the spark to light the spiritual fires of renewal.
In the Fall of 1989, I called the person in charge of registration and told them I had ten people from the Augusta area who wanted to walk. After a long period of silence, and answering a number of curious questions about sponsors, etc., Caroline Evans said she would send us applications, even though Walk #8 was just two weeks away. Little did we know that the North Georgia Community would add an extra table to accommodate our small group. The ten who went to North Georgia were: Tom & Gina Fagan, Dennis & Sandra Huckaby, Roger & Rene LeDuc, & Rex, Mildred, Judy & Ron Fearneyhough.
As the five men returned home singing "Sing Alleluia" all the way from Atlanta, our hearts were burning with plans for an Emmaus Community. However, my plans were soon put on the back burner due to seminary studies. Then Blair "Bulldog" Edenfield and Dave "Joyful" Sanbach called and made an appointment with us. Blair and Dave shared with us about their Cursillo weekend and their involvement in the Kairos prison ministry. They too wanted to help begin an Emmaus Community - and they wanted it now!
Blair called Nashville and was told the North Georgia Community could sponsor a new community until a full board could be elected. An "Augusta" Emmaus steering committee was formed. John Alexander joined the committee and the planning sessions were held in Blythe church. As plans for the first walk materialized, I was appointed to the Tignall charge in February of 1990. At my first Independence UMC Council meeting, they approved the usage of the fellowship hall for an overnight team weekend. As the "Atlanta" team for Georgia-Lina Walk #1 arrived, it was a typical "rowdy, joyful" bunch of men and women. Tignall wondered what they had approved! Bedrolls and sleeping bags filled the Sunday School rooms and the two bathrooms were maxed out for the "sponge baths." But there were no complaints - it was a memorable moment. By the way, the only facility Blair could locate for a Walk was Camp Daniel Marshall.
Bob Sapp and JoAnn Beasenberg were Walk #1 Lay Directors. Spiritual Directors were Gene Collum and Cherie Jones (recently appointed leader of Emmaus in Nashville). We had to stack the deck - of the seven men pilgrims, only two men were from Augusta: Skip Gartman and David Fearneyhough. The women had nine pilgrims, eight from Augusta. Monthly Gatherings were planned at Marvin United Methodist Church.
Charlie Beasenberg and Jan Thrower were the Lay Directors for Walk #2, with 12 men and 12 women pilgrims.
Walk #3 featured our first husband and wife Lay Director team: Dave and Sue Sanbach, and 20 men and 22 women pilgrims.
Walk #4 featured our first home-grown Lay Directors: Blair Edenfield and Sue Tankersly.
Lay Directors for Walk #5 were Judy and David Fearneyhough; Walk #6: Lamont Lannae and Theresa Baston; Walk #7: Roger LeDuc and Jeanne Lindsey (eight pastors were on the men's walk); Walk #8: Dave Toburen and Pat Miller; Walk #9: Chuck Lanier and Renee LeDuc; Walk #10: Bruce Dowdy and Carolyn Lane; Women's Walk #11: Judy Fearneyhough; Men's Walk #11: Steve Karnowski; and Women's Walk #12: Carol Sayers.
I would like to mention three foundational stones who built the Georgia-Lina Emmaus Community. Blair Edenfield invested hours into the organization and planning, serving as Lay Director of the community for several years. He is the official photographer of Kairos and Emmaus. He purchased the trailer and other equipment we use each weekend, provided sleeping accommodations, organized set-up and take-down, and was present at send-offs, candlelights, and closings. Chris Edenfield undertook the huge job of organizing the kitchen, writing the recipes, putting inventories on the computer, making nametags for every walk, copying and providing the stacks of manuals and other lists which support the weekend. Dave Sanbach was treasurer for three years. He invested time, talent and financial support. We owe them a debt we can never repay. They helped prepare the way!
As Lamont Lannae has shared numerous times...he was so disappointed when he walked into that first gathering at Marvin and there were only eight or nine persons present; and how for the first candlelights, we would space one person per pew to make a line - and now it is gloriously full for when the saints come marching in! Who knows, perhaps one day we too will sponsor a new community, maybe in Costa Rica!

Thursday, September 3, 2009

Why Moralism Is Not the Gospel -- And Why So Many Christians Think It Is

[This post is from Dr. Albert Mohler's blog, dated today.]


scold5808023thb.jpg

Posted: Thursday, September 03, 2009 at 4:14 am
One of the most amazing statements by the Apostle Paul is his indictment of the Galatian Christians for abandoning the Gospel. "I am amazed that you are so quickly deserting Him who called you by the grace of Christ, for a different gospel," Paul declared. As he stated so emphatically, the Galatians had failed in the crucial test of discerning the authentic Gospel from its counterfeits.

His words could not be more clear: "But even if we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you a gospel contrary to what we have preached to you, he is to be accursed! As we have said before, so I say again now, if any man is preaching to you a gospel contrary to what you have received, he is to be accursed!" [Gal. 1:6-7]

This warning from the Apostle Paul, expressed in the language of the Apostle's shock and grief, is addressed not only to the church in Galatia, but to every congregation in every age. In our own day -- and in our own churches -- we desperately need to hear and to heed this warning. In our own time, we face false gospels no less subversive and seductive than those encountered and embraced by the Galatians.

In our own context, one of the most seductive false gospels is moralism. This false gospel can take many forms and can emerge from any number of political and cultural impulses. Nevertheless, the basic structure of moralism comes down to this -- the belief that the Gospel can be reduced to improvements in behavior.

Sadly, this false gospel is particularly attractive to those who believe themselves to be evangelicals motivated by a biblical impulse. Far too many believers and their churches succumb to the logic of moralism and reduce the Gospel to a message of moral improvement. In other words, we communicate to lost persons the message that what God desires for them and demands of them is to get their lives straight.

In one sense, we are born to be moralists. Created in God's image, we have been given the moral capacity of conscience. From our earliest days our conscience cries out to us the knowledge of our guilt, shortcomings, and misbehaviors. In other words, our conscience communicates our sinfulness.

Add to this the fact that the process of parenting and child rearing tends to inculcate moralism from our earliest years. Very quickly we learn that our parents are concerned with our behavior. Well behaved children are rewarded with parental approval, while misbehavior brings parental sanction. This message is reinforced by other authorities in young lives and pervades the culture at large.

Writing about his own childhood in rural Georgia, the novelist Ferrol Sams described the deeply-ingrained tradition of being "raised right." As he explained, the child who is "raised right" pleases his parents and other adults by adhering to moral conventions and social etiquette. A young person who is "raised right" emerges as an adult who obeys the laws, respects his neighbors, gives at least lip service to religious expectations, and stays away from scandal. The point is clear -- this is what parents expect, the culture affirms, and many churches celebrate. But our communities are filled with people who have been "raised right" but are headed for hell.

The seduction of moralism is the essence of its power. We are so easily seduced into believing that we actually can gain all the approval we need by our behavior. Of course, in order to participate in this seduction, we must negotiate a moral code that defines acceptable behavior with innumerable loopholes. Most moralists would not claim to be without sin, but merely beyond scandal. That is considered sufficient.

Moralists can be categorized as both liberal and conservative. In each case, a specific set of moral concerns frames the moral expectation. As a generalization, it is often true that liberals focus on a set of moral expectations related to social ethics while conservatives tend to focus on personal ethics. The essence of moralism is apparent in both -- the belief that we can achieve righteousness by means of proper behavior.

The theological temptation of moralism is one many Christians and churches find it difficult to resist. The danger is that the church will communicate by both direct and indirect means that what God expects of fallen humanity is moral improvement. In so doing, the church subverts the Gospel and communicates a false gospel to a fallen world.

Christ's Church has no option but to teach the Word of God, and the Bible faithfully reveals the law of God and a comprehensive moral code. Christians understand that God has revealed Himself throughout creation in such a way that He has gifted all humanity with the restraining power of the law. Furthermore, He has spoken to us in His word with the gift of specific commands and comprehensive moral instruction. The faithful Church of the Lord Jesus Christ must contend for the righteousness of these commands and the grace given to us in the knowledge of what is good and what is evil. We also have a responsibility to bear witness of this knowledge of good and evil to our neighbors. The restraining power of the law is essential to human community and to civilization.

Just as parents rightly teach their children to obey moral instruction, the church also bears responsibility to teach its own the moral commands of God and to bear witness to the larger society of what God has declared to be right and good for His human creatures.

But these impulses, right and necessary as they are, are not the Gospel. Indeed, one of the most insidious false gospels is a moralism that promises the favor of God and the satisfaction of God's righteousness to sinners if they will only behave and commit themselves to moral improvement.

The moralist impulse in the church reduces the Bible to a codebook for human behavior and substitutes moral instruction for the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Far too many evangelical pulpits are given over to moralistic messages rather than the preaching of the Gospel.

The corrective to moralism comes directly from the Apostle Paul when he insists that "a man is not justified by the works of the Law but through faith in Christ Jesus." Salvation comes to those who are "justified by faith in Christ and not by the works of the Law; since by the works of the Law no flesh will be justified." [Gal. 2:16]

We sin against Christ and we misrepresent the Gospel when we suggest to sinners that what God demands of them is moral improvement in accordance with the Law. Moralism makes sense to sinners, for it is but an expansion of what we have been taught from our earliest days. But moralism is not the Gospel, and it will not save. The only gospel that saves is the Gospel of Christ. As Paul reminded the Galatians, "But when the fullness of the time came, God sent forth His Son, born of a woman, born under the Law, so that He might redeem those who were under the Law, that we might receive the adoption as sons." [Gal. 4:4-5]

We are justified by faith alone, saved by grace alone, and redeemed from our sin by Christ alone. Moralism produces sinners who are (potentially) better behaved. The Gospel of Christ transforms sinners into the adopted sons and daughters of God.

The Church must never evade, accommodate, revise, or hide the law of God. Indeed, it is the Law that shows us our sin and makes clear our inadequacy and our total lack of righteousness. The Law cannot impart life but, as Paul insists, it "has become our tutor to lead us to Christ, so that we may be justified by faith." [Gal. 3:24]

The deadly danger of moralism has been a constant temptation to the church and an ever-convenient substitute for the Gospel. Clearly, millions of our neighbors believe that moralism is our message. Nothing less than the boldest preaching of the Gospel will suffice to correct this impression and to lead sinners to salvation in Christ.

Hell will be highly populated with those who were "raised right." The citizens of heaven will be those who, by the sheer grace and mercy of God, are there solely because of the imputed righteousness of Jesus Christ.

Moralism is not the gospel.

___________________________

I am always glad to hear from readers. Write me at mail@albertmohler.com. Follow regular updates on Twitter through the day at www.twitter.com/AlbertMohler.





© 2009, All rights reserved, www.AlbertMohler.com

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

The Obama Slide



The Obama Slide



Published: August 31, 2009
Two tides swept over American politics last winter. The first was the Obama tide. Barack Obama came into office with an impressive 70 percent approval rating. The second was the independent tide. Over the first months of this year, the number of people who called themselves either Democrats or Republicans declined, while the number who called themselves independents surged ahead.


David Brooks
Go to Columnist Page »

The Conversation


David Brooks and Gail Collins talk between columns.
All Conversations »

Readers' Comments

Readers shared their thoughts on this article.
Obama’s challenge was to push his agenda through a Democratic-controlled government while retaining the affection of the 39 percent of Americans in the middle.
The administration hasn’t been able to pull it off. From the stimulus to health care, it has joined itself at the hip to the liberal leadership in Congress. The White House has failed to veto measures, like the pork-laden omnibus spending bill, that would have demonstrated independence and fiscal restraint. By force of circumstances and by design, the president has promoted one policy after another that increases spending and centralizes power in Washington.
The result is the Obama slide, the most important feature of the current moment. The number of Americans who trust President Obama to make the right decisions has fallen by roughly 17 percentage points. Obama’s job approval is down to about 50 percent. All presidents fall from their honeymoon highs, but in the history of polling, no newly elected American president has fallen this far this fast.
Anxiety is now pervasive. Trust in government rose when Obama took office. It has fallen back to historic lows. Fifty-nine percent of Americans now think the country is headed in the wrong direction.
The public’s view of Congress, which ticked upward for a time, has plummeted. Charlie Cook, who knows as much about Congressional elections as anyone in the country, wrote recently that Democratic fortunes have “slipped completely out of control.” He and the experts he surveyed believe there is just as much chance that the Democrats could lose more than 20 House seats in the next elections as less than 20.
There are also warning signs in the Senate. A recent poll shows Harry Reid, the majority leader, trailing the Republican Danny Tarkanian, a possible 2010 opponent, by 49 percent to 38 percent. When your majority leader is down to a 38 percent base in his home state, that’s not good.
The public has soured on Obama’s policy proposals. Voters often have only a fuzzy sense of what each individual proposal actually does, but more and more have a growing conviction that if the president is proposing it, it must involve big spending, big government and a fundamental departure from the traditional American approach.
Driven by this general anxiety, and by specific concerns, public opposition to health care reform is now steady and stable. Independents once solidly supported reform. Now they have swung against it. As the veteran pollster Bill McInturff has pointed out, public attitudes toward Obamacare exactly match public attitudes toward Clintoncare when that reform effort collapsed in 1994.
Amazingly, some liberals are now lashing out at Obama because the entire country doesn’t agree with The Huffington Post. Some now argue that the administration should just ignore the ignorant masses and ram health care through using reconciliation, the legislative maneuver that would reduce the need for moderate votes.
This would be suicidal. You can’t pass the most important domestic reform in a generation when the majority of voters think you are on the wrong path. To do so would be a sign of unmitigated arrogance. If Obama agrees to use reconciliation, he will permanently affix himself to the liberal wing of his party and permanently alienate independents. He will be president of 35 percent of the country — and good luck getting anything done after that.
The second liberal response has been to attack the budget director, Peter Orszag. It was a mistake to put cost control at the center of the health reform sales job, many now argue. The president shouldn’t worry about the deficit. Just pass the spending parts.
But fiscal restraint is now the animating issue for moderate Americans. To take the looming $9 trillion in debt and balloon it further would be to enrage a giant part of the electorate.
This is a country that has always been suspicious of centralized government. This is a country that has just lived through an economic trauma caused by excessive spending and debt. Most Americans still admire Obama and want him to succeed. But if he doesn’t proceed in a manner consistent with the spirit of the nation and the times, voters will find a way to stop him.
The president’s challenge now is to halt the slide. That doesn’t mean giving up his goals. It means he has to align his proposals to the values of the political center: fiscal responsibility, individual choice and decentralized authority.
Events have pushed Barack Obama off to the left. Time to rebalance.